Darkness and Light

Book Review

The Best Day the Worst Day: Life with Jane Kenyon. By Donald Hall. Houghton Mifflin, 272 pp.

A Hundred White Daffodils. By Jane Kenyon Graywolf 226 pp., paperback.

Collected Poems. By Jane Kenyon. Graywolf 320 pp.

 

Edgar Allan Poe once famously opined that the death of a beautiful woman is "unquestionably the most poetical topic in the world." What if the woman is also a poet, death comes early, and her husband is a famous poet as well? This convergence surely played some part in the renown that has gathered around Jane Kenyon. Yet even before her untimely death in 1995 fame had begun to find her. An award-winning Bill Moyers documentary about Kenyon, her husband, Donald Hall, and their life together surely helped. And just as surely, none of it would have happened if not for her brilliant books of poems -- The Boat of Quiet Hours (1986), Let Evening Come (1990), Constance (1993) and the posthumous Otherwise (1996). A clutch of recent books, including a generous collection of poems from Graywolf, her longtime publisher, seem sure to keep both her work and her life in the public eye.

Kenyon’s life story is fascinating and wrenching, the stuff of both highbrow and middlebrow drama, She was a college student who married her much older professor, retreated with him from university life to a family farmhouse in New Hampshire, rediscovered her faith (without turning into a wild-eyed zealot), bravely battled depression, came into her own as a poet and loyally nursed her husband through two difficult bouts with cancer. Just when all seemed to be looking up, she was herself struck down by leukemia, leaving behind a legacy of unsparing, brave and beautiful poems.

Squinted at in another way, Kenyon’s life follows the arc of the classic conversion narrative: early churchgoing, adolescent rebellion, and return to the church as an adult. As she tells it, it was her grandmother’s "spiritual obsession" and frightening talk of hell that drove her away from the church as a girl: "By the time I was in high school I grew contemptuous of religion and the people I knew who practiced it, although I took great pains to hide this development from Grandmother. . . . I announced to my parents that one could not be a Christian and an intellectual, and that I would no longer attend church."

Kenyon went to the University of Michigan, where she first encountered Hall in 1969 when she took his large, lecture-style poetry class. As Hall tells the story in The Best Day the Worst Day, they did not really meet until the next year, when she enrolled in his writing workshop. When they married in 1972, she was 24 and he 43.

Three years later she and Hall moved to his grandmother’s house in New Hampshire for what they thought would be only a sabbatical year. Their first weekend Hall mentioned that they would probably be expected to show up at the local church. An oft-repeated anecdote concerns the sermon they heard that first Sunday and minister Jack Jensen’s mention of the German poet Rainer Maria Rilke.

"And how I did perk up then," Kenyon remarks in an unfinished essay reprinted in A Hundred White Daffodils, which also includes interviews, columns written for a local newspaper and Kenyon’s translations of others’ works. "Even in the years of my apostasy I never doubted that God exists, and that I exist in relation to God." At first their churchgoing was more social than spiritual, but before long they were regulars -- Kenyon was church treasurer for more than a decade. "Within a short time," she notes in an interview with Moyers, "I discovered that I had an enormous spiritual hunger that I knew nothing about."

Before that first year was up, both were ready to remain in New England. The beauty of the area around Mt. Kearsarge and Eagle Pond, for which their house is named, was one factor. In an interview with Mike Pride, Kenyon explains deeper reasons: "I never felt a sense of community in Ann Arbor. Here I felt it immediately. . . . It makes one less self-obsessed and more concerned about the needs of others. It gives you a feeling that you are part of the great stream."

Kenyon and Hall thrived in the unstructured days at Eagle Pond, and Kenyon in particular began to write more seriously and steadily than ever before. Solitude and "a lot of hours to fill" were crucial: "For me, poetry comes out of silence, and I can have silence here."

Community and solitude, then, were two sides of the coin for Kenyon and Hall as they established their life together. Hall’s earlier books and other literary sources of income enabled them to avoid steady outside work and to devise a daily pattern that included large chunks of writing time. Hall describes their habits in The Best Day the Worst Day: "We got up early in the morning. I brought Jane coffee in bed. She walked the dog as I started writing, then climbed the stairs to work at her own desk on her own poems and on [poet] Akhmatova. We had lunch. We lay down together. We rose and worked at secondary things. I read aloud to Jane; we played scoreless ping-pong; we read the mail; we worked again. . . . If we were lucky the phone didn’t ring all day."

Kenyon’s first book, From Room to Room (1978), is full of poems written after the move to New England. Some deal with her sense of dislocation and effort to feel at home: "You always belonged here. / You were theirs, certain as a rock. / I’m the one who worries / if I fit in with the furniture / and the landscape." Kenyon’s signature style is present here, with its spare presentation, simplicity and details drawn from the natural world and domestic life, Poems like "Finding a Long Gray Hair" make it plain that the move will be successful in more ways than one: when I find a long gray hair / floating in the pail, / I feel my life added to theirs." Beyond those details, though, she found a "subject" in the place itself: "The things I noticed about this place were all subjects for poems, and suddenly I had a broad view . . . . It’s still such an amazement that we live here among these mountains and hills."

Early in the New England years, Kenyon began to translate the poems of Anna Akhmatova. the great Russian poet (1889-1966). This project, suggested to her by Robert Bly, energized her own writing: "I know that if I had not worked so hard on Akhmatova," Kenyon remarked, "I would never have experienced that surge of power" that resulted in the poems in her second book, The Boat of Quiet Hours.

Jane Kenyon had a home in a beautiful place, freedom from day-to-day labor, a loving and successful spouse, friends, church, connections to a community, increasing success as a poet. Yet in spite of all these blessings, a ground note of darkness and suffering runs through her poems -- one that tempers, complicates and finally enriches them. This note of melancholy is essential; ". . . the soul’s bliss / and suffering are bound together / like the grasses, she wrote in "Twilight: After Haying." Kenyon’s long struggle with bipolar disorder is inseparable from her work, as it was from the rest of her life. (She preferred the old-fashioned term melancholy.)

Hints of the existential darkness that was never too far from her can be seen even in her praise for the God her minister speaks of, "a God who overcomes you with love, not a God of rules and prohibitions. This was a God who, if you ask, forgives you no matter how far down in the well you are. If I didn’t believe that I couldn’t live."

The other side of Kenyon’s movement to faith is implied in that last sentence. While her life and work were not defined by melancholy, they were surely saturated by it, drenched in it -- and it is probably fair to say that her poems would not exist as we have them without melancholy. Their strength and beauty are found precisely in their honest grappling with despair and faith, and in the sense that the struggle between the two is perilously close.

Kenyon’s most difficult bout of depression came in 1982, following her father’s death. Many poems in The Boat of Quiet Hours (1986) are from this time. Some of the markers are explicit, as in "Depression in Winter" and "Ice Storm" ("The most painful longing comes over me. / A longing not of the body"). The yearning and sadness are not conquered so much as modulated into something slightly, subtly different -- as in "Twilight: After Haying," where bliss joins suffering as part of the soul’s reality, and both seem present in the beautiful, difficult praise of the world with which the poem ends:

The last, sweet exhalations

of timothy and vetch

go out with the song of the bird;

the ravaged field

grows wet with dew.

Such resolutions, however beautiful, were not final for Kenyon, and she would continue to work and live within these complications. Medication was of some help, as was the support of family and friends, but she endured the ups and downs familiar to anyone who knows bipolar disorder, and she was never entirely rid of them. "August Rain, after Haying" describes the feelings this way:

The grass resolves to grow again,

receiving the rain to that end,

but my disordered soul thirsts

after something it cannot name.

"Having It Out with Melancholy," published in Constance (1993), offers Kenyon’s most extended description of her long struggle. Its epigraph from Chekhov is difficult and accurate; "If many remedies are prescribed for an illness, you may be sure that the illness has no cure." Addressing the condition directly, Kenyon complains; "You taught me to exist without gratitude. / You ruined my manners toward God." In part three, a "Suggestion from a Friend" is offered without comment: "You wouldn’t be so depressed / if you really believed in God." That poem also describes a 1980 mystical experience: "I saw / that I was a speck of light in the great / river of light that undulates through time." Yet the poem’s aim is not ecstasy but something much more modest: to "come back to marriage and friends," even "With the wonder / and bitterness of someone pardoned / for a crime she did not commit"; to find it possible to rediscover "ordinary contentment" and ordinary life.

Perhaps Kenyon’s most troubling major poem is "Women, Why Are You Weeping" -- a late, long poem about a trip to India and its challenge to her faith. There is no easy recovery here, no recovery at all, only a new and unsettling series of images and questions:

India, with her ceaseless

bells and fire; her crows calling stridently

all night; India with her sandalwood

smoke, and graceful gods, many-headed and many-

armed, has taken away the one who blessed

and kept me.

Kenyon chose not to include this poem in Otherwise (1996), which was mostly written before her final illness but was assembled for publication during her treatment for leukemia. Hall, after consulting with their poet friends, decided to include the poem in both A Hundred White Daffodils and Collected Poems. Kenyon’s readers may be of various minds about this decision, but the poem, after sharp depictions of a series of street scenes, ends with a compelling image:

"What shall we do about this?" I asked

my God, who even then was leaving me. The reply

was scorching wind, lapping of water, pull

of the black oarsmen on the oars . . .

Whatever her doubts and griefs, something in Kenyon persevered in hope. Despite all the nearly unendurable elements of her life, she told Bill Moyers, "I feel that there is a great goodness. Why, when there could have been nothing, is there something? This is a great mystery. How, when there could have been nothing, does it happen that there is love, kindness, beauty?"

In the end, faith and poetry were not separable for Kenyon. Indeed, for her poetry was not merely an expression of faith but a means toward faith. "Poetry has an unearthly ability to turn suffering into beauty," she once remarked, going on to relate her work to Emily Dickinson’s: "[She] thinks a lot about her soul, and I think a lot about mine. She thinks about her relation to God -- a God who is distant, and rather clumsily arbitrary. In many of my poems I am searching, clumsily, for God. We are both full of terror, finally, and puzzlement, at the creation."

Both poets’ search for God led them to create poetic landscapes that are highly charged, often lovely, sometimes frightening. Like Dickinson, Kenyon was convinced that her duty as a poet -- and as a Christian, I think she would have added -- was to honor the beauty, terror and mystery of existence.

"The poet’s job is to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth," she wrote, "in such a beautiful way that people cannot live without it; to put into words those feelings we all have that are so deep, so important, and yet so difficult to name." The link between beauty and sadness is everywhere in her work, especially in her awareness of mutability. Perhaps her best poems are treasured by so many readers because of the way they poise between sadness and joy:

Things: simply lasting, then

failing to last: water, a blue heron’s

eye, and the light passing

between them: into light all things

must fall, glad at last to have fallen.

The Word Made Rock (Matt. 7:21-29)

 

"Be like the wise man who built his house on the rock"

In Papago Park, a preserve near the center of Phoenix, two small rock mountains rise up from the desert. One of them, Garden Butte, is 1.6 billion years old. The other, about half a mile away, is a youngster at only 17 million years old.

Because Phoenix receives fewer than ten inches of rain-fall every year, Garden Butte and its younger cousin aren’t covered with trees. One sees only rock, rock that has been around for eons. When I travel to the United Church of Christ conference office, or to see friends, I try to get to Papago Park to see those two rock mountains. Being in the presence of something millions of years old helps me keep my life and my ministry in perspective.

There’s Camelback to the north, the Estrellas on the west and the Superstitions to the east. South Mountain Park, where I spent a good part of my childhood exploring and scrambling over boulders, completes the circle. If it’s not smoggy, you can see beyond the Phoenix mountains to others in the distance, sometimes even as far as Four Peaks, which may be crested with snow if it’s been a wet winter.

As I gaze at these peaks, I sometimes imagine them emerging from the desert floor. I see dinosaurs roaming the land. I wonder which layers of rock color and variety represent which layer of earth’s history. The scope of time reminds me that "a thousand ages in thy sight are like an evening gone."

"Build your house on the rock and not on the sand." When Jesus ended his sermon with these words about faith, he was probably standing on a mount not unlike these Phoenix mountains. Matthew says the crowd was astonished, for Jesus "taught as one who had authority." That’s not surprising. Whether in Israel or Arizona, any desert dweller knows you build on rock and not sand. Just look at what survives in this land. It’s not tumbleweeds, that grow fast and big in easy places like sandy washes, but then dry out between the rains and blow away in the first big wind.

It’s the saguaro cacti, "giants of the desert," 70-feet high with root spans to match, that make it to two centuries. In the high desert of Santa Fe (altitude 7,000 feet), pinions and junipers survive too, They put down roots in the rockiest of places, wherever they have something to hang onto. A favorite painting by a Navajo friend shows a lone pinion tree growing out of the side of a cliff, its roots anchored in the rock. It’s not a huge tree, but it’s there, a good metaphor for life and ministry in the desert.

Desert people also know about desert thunderstorms, another part of Jesus’ sermon. For years, developers in the Southwest have sold newcomers land in the flood plains. It’s cheap to build on sand, and people can’t believe it ever rains here. But it does. Clouds move in and out in minutes, leaving the sightseer drenched. Those newcomer houses built on the sand are the first to go. What lasts in the desert are the "rocks of ages" and the life, both human and plant, that are anchored in them.

As a child I thought the mountains would always be here, always offering a place to climb and explore, always inviting me to imagine other worlds in long-ago times, connecting me to the eternal. The desert and its mountains gave me the foundation I needed to get through the storms and dry times of life. When I moved back West 18 years ago, I found new sermons and lessons in the landscape around me.

But in much of the West, neither children nor adults have a chance to know the desert’s incarnation of the Christian faith. Every hour an acre of desert is taken for development. Since 1990 the Phoenix area has doubled. Albuquerque and Las Vegas are not far behind. The exponential growth has drastically changed life not only for plants and animals but also for people. More and more shopping malls, big-box stores and housing developments block the vast vistas and mountain views. In Phoenix, air pollution often dims the valley’s mountains. Hundreds of miles away, the colors of the Grand Canyon -- layers of red and gold rock millions of years in the making -- are often obscured by smog from the cars of Phoenix, Vegas and even Los Angeles.

The rapacious development of the West troubles me. It’s not just nostalgia for days gone by, or the environmental concerns. When ageless mountains are blocked by Walmarts and smog, we don’t just lose breathtaking views. We also lose a direct experience of Jesus’ rock foundation. When green lawns and swimming pools replace centuries-old saguaros or pinions, plants and animals aren’t the only losers. We’re also destroying our incarnate connection to Jesus’ lesson on building a faith that lasts.

Ironically, the overdevelopment also illustrates Jesus warning about false foundations. Like a house on sand, the West has an equally risky base -- borrowed water. Depleting water tables and pumping water from faraway sources like the Colorado River has made development fast and easy. But a region built on borrowed water has no more chance of surviving than a house built on sand.

I am grateful for the foundation of faith laid for me by both the Bible and by this desert land. As a minister of a young church in the Southwest, I believe my call is to pass on that biblical bedrock and also to care for this corner of creation that makes it incarnate.

A Doubt and a Promise (Matt. 28:16-20)

"When they saw him, they worshiped him, but some doubted."

Passages like this assure me there’s a place for me and the people I serve. Unlike John’s story of Thomas, Matthew didn’t single out one disciple as the doubter. He says that some doubted." While Thomas was clear about his doubt ("unless I see the print of the nails Matthew didn’t say why they doubted -- or what they doubted. Perhaps they weren’t sure it was Jesus, or they doubted he had actually died. Maybe they had simply been through enough and weren’t about to be fooled or hurt again.

Thomas demanded proof. Jesus gave it. But Jesus didn’t address their doubt by telling and unpacking a parable or assuring them with another teaching. Not now. Now he simply commissioned them: "Go and make disciples, baptize, teach."

Apparently having doubts didn’t let them off the hook. Believe it or not, they still had a job to do. As they say in AA, "Fake it till you make it." I think Jesus said the same thing that day on the mountaintop.

I’m glad he did. Some people seem born to believe. For others, myself included, "faking it" has been part of the process. Always one to hedge my bets, I went to seminary on a "trial year" fellowship. Sometimes it’s hard to remember how passionately uncertain I was when I began 30 years ago. From the beginning, it was unclear who was on trial -- me or the school. I’d started college as a biology major but switched to religion and political science after taking a course from a professor who was also a rabbi.

It was the 1970s. None of my classmates were going to church, much less seminary. I had a slew of doubts. I wasn’t sure I had the right to be in a relationship with God. I doubted that I was patient enough, kind enough, loving enough, Christian enough to be a minister.

But as Woody Allen says, "Ninety percent of life is showing up." Like the disciples on the mountain, the trial year gave me the chance to show up -- in worship, in class, in the life of the community. To show up in the relationship with God, the Bible, and this thing called faith. By the end of the year, I still had doubts about my legitimacy as a minister and a Christian. But I had no doubt I wanted to continue the journey.

Two years later, an internship gave me a chance to show up -- in at a hospital room, a youth retreat, the house where someone had just died, the pulpit. Those encounters gave me a chance to put flesh on my faith. They taught me the blessing Jesus offered with his commission: "Lo, I am with you always" (even if my fingers were crossed).

By graduation I hadn’t answered all my questions, nor had I dispelled my impatience, feistiness and other non-Christian virtues. But without a doubt, I’d learned that faith was always a process and not some kind of neatly packaged product. Faith has stood me in good stead over the last 25 years, especially the last 18 as a minister in Santa Fe. The church I serve is celebrating its 25th anniversary. When I accepted the call in 1987, I wasn’t sure if either the church or I would make it to the next year, much less our 25th.

The congregation was founded in 1980 and had 90 members and a half-million-dollar mortgage. Our children’s space was so small that if more than 12 youngsters showed up, we spent our time slowing unchristian fights and skirmishes. The church was generous in terms of outreach giving, but we had no staff, not even a part-time secretary. To top it off, the congregation had just gone through two years of difficult leadership issues and came close to splitting.

Suffice it to say, I had my doubts. Sometimes I felt that the church wasn’t even sure it wanted to be a church. Santa Fe seemed to be a place where spirituality was in, but religion, especially organized religion, was out. Sometimes that led to new approaches. The sanctuary was the "Gathering Room," the Sunday school a "Learning Center." But the ethos could also be disempowering. One leader told me I shouldn’t ask people to "affirm their baptism" when they joined the church. Asking them to "follow in the paths of peace and justice" was OK, but not as a "disciple of Jesus Christ." United Way, yes. United Church, not so sure.

But we’ve kept trying to live into our commission as a church. At times, I’ve felt like Professor Harold Hill in The Music Man, selling the idea that United could be a church just as the professor promoted the idea of a boy’s band. But with others who share that vision, it’s paid off. We’ve been committed to a strong children’s and youth program, and next month we’ll initiate 13 confirmands.

Worship has always been at the center of our life, even when we couldn’t afford a pianist. My first Easter we cobbled together a pickup choir to sing the "Hallelujah Chorus." We’ve sung it every Easter since.

When I get discouraged and full of doubt about our future, I remember this passage where true believers and doubting Thomases, Andrews, Johns and even Talithas all were assigned a job to do and a promise to go with it. No doubt that’s why it’s called the good news.

True Grit (Joshua 24:1-3a, 14-25)

He had real grit, that Joshua. When his fellow spies felt like grasshoppers and the Canaanites looked like giants, Joshua and his friend Caleb urged the Hebrews to take them on even when their compatriots threatened to stone them for their advice. After Moses died and Joshua assumed command, he showed his mettle by trusting God to bring down the walls of Jericho with only the sound of the trumpet and the shouts of the people.

But I think Joshua’s greatest moment came in his farewell speech to the Israelites, when he told them the truth about their covenant with God. He and his family had chosen to follow the Lord, Joshua proclaimed. The people roared enthusiastically. They would do the same. But Joshua didn’t accept their initial response. Instead he reminded them not once but three times of the cost of that covenant and the consequences of breaking it. If they dealt falsely with their God, Joshua warned, God would do them harm and consume them. Probably the Hebrews were ready to stone him for being so demandingly honest.

As a parish minister, I assume Joshua’s role when I invite people to affirm their covenant with God and one another. But I seldom have his courage in the follow-through. If I did, when parents brought their child for baptism, I would ask more than the generic "Do you promise to grow with this child in the Christian faith and offer him or her the nurture of the Christian church?"

Instead I’d ask, in front of God and the whole congregation, "Do you promise to get him or her out of bed, dressed and here every Sunday morning for the next 18 years, even when you’ve had a long week or you’d rather sleep in or there’s a soccer match or when this darling infant has grown into a surly, tatooed teenager who thinks church is ‘dumb’?"

I’ve never been that honest about baptismal vows. I bet Joshua would have been. When people join the church, Joshua would have asked more than a rote "Do you renounce the powers of evil and seek the freedom of new life in Christ?" After the unsuspecting new member said yes, Joshua would have followed with, "So when you buy your next car, will you resist all the commercial hype that encourages you to overspend on something that eats up resources and pollutes the air?"

Had Joshua presided at my ordination, I doubt he would have let me get by with a simple vow to study, pray, teach and preach. He probably would have demanded, "Will you give up your personal gods of procrastination, perfectionism and the pursuit of trivia?"

As a pastor, of course I’d like to beef up the traditional vows of baptism or membership. But then I’d need more assurance in dealing with Joshua’s dire consequences of covenant-breaking. For many people in my congregation, the primary experience of covenants -- marriage, family, church affiliation or job -- has been their endings. How do I capture Joshua’s passion for keeping covenant with God without sounding judgmental and damning of persons whose human covenants have been broken, either by design or default?

Joshua’s uncompromising stance on the exclusivity of the covenant poses another challenge. Even as a child growing up Congregational in the Southwest, I knew the history of violence and devastation that faithful Protestants inflicted on Native Americans and Catholics when they encountered those people’s "foreign gods."

Yet when I moved back west after a ten-year sojourn among Connecticut Yankees, the spiritual smorgasbord of Santa Fe felt overwhelming. Like other New Age centers, it seemed filled with Anglo spiritual dilettantes, people who had grown up Protestant or Catholic and then tried every spiritual path from Buddhism and Native American practices to Sufi dancing and Hindu chant. When they landed at the United Church of Santa Fe, they often felt lost and disoriented, as if they had gone through multiple intimate relationships. At the same time, they were wary and uncertain about committing to any faith tradition.

I resonate with Joshua’s willingness to affirm what he believed, but I want to do it without damning other faiths. How do I retain the essence of his covenant without its exclusivity?

A chance encounter with Martin Marty taught me how. In 1989 Marty was speaking on religious pluralism at the University of New Mexico. I almost didn’t go -- I’d had my fill of spiritual "options." But I’d enjoyed his columns in the CENTURY for years, so I made the two-hour trip. What Marty said that night has been a plumb line for my ministry. When I asked, "What advice do you have for a United Church of Christ pastor serving a church that isn’t sure it wants to be a Christian church in the New Age capital of Santa Fe?" He paused. "The United Church of Christ?" he asked. I nodded. "You have the blood of the Puritans in you! Claim your inheritance." But then he said, "If you go deep enough into any faith tradition, you find the common ground with all other traditions. That’s why a Baptist preacher like Martin Luther King could learn from Gandhi the Hindu, or why a Capuchin like Thomas Merton was in conversation with Buddhist monks."

"I think that’s what all of us are seeking," he continued. "We want that common ground. But we have to go deep into our own tradition to find it. You need to tell your people that."

It’s been almost 15 years since that night, but there’s seldom a day I don’t remember Marty’s words. "Go deep," he said. It sounds like Joshua’s "Choose this day whom you will serve." Either way, it takes grit. Either way it leads to life and to God.

Sit on It (Judges 4:1-7)

Deborah: Judge. Prophetess. Wife or "spirited woman," depending on how you translate the Hebrew. Powerful woman who advised generals and led troops into battle. Creative woman who composed songs of victory. Wise woman who "sat."

As a seminarian, I was impressed by Deborah’s many roles and responsibilities. She was a leader of men when women could only be wives, sisters and mothers. A judge, when a woman’s testimony never counted as much as a man’s. On the front line, when a woman’s place was in the home.

I am still impressed by all that. But 20-plus years later, as a minister with a considerable number of roles myself, I’m equally impressed with the phrase; "She used to sit." I think it’s the most radical thing she did, especially as a leader. We leaders organize, plan, execute, strategize. We lead. We don’t sit.

My mother used to sit. As a widowed parent to four children, a science teacher and a volunteer for church and 4-H, she had little time to sit. Yet every morning before we got up, she’d sit in her chair in the living room, a cup of coffee in one hand, the Bible in the other. If the afternoon permitted it, she did the same, although with a cup of tea or a can of beer (if the day had been really long), and with the newspaper instead of the Bible. We kids knew the time was sacred and did not disturb her with "What’s for dinner?"

I think we knew that sitting made all the other activity possible. It didn’t solve all our problems as a family, of which there were many, or guarantee order out of chaos. But sitting offered my mother a chance to catch her breath, to remember life was more than the task at hand, and to tap into some sense of peace in the midst of the maelstrom.

I suspect that was true for Deborah as well. Leaders need wisdom and courage and can’t find those qualities if they’re always out front leading the charge. Sometimes they need just to sit.

Sitting is usually the last thing I want to do, or that I think others expect me to do. As the minister of a growing church, I’ve spent the last 15 years as a strategic planner, organizer, cajoler, counselor, preacher, even construction supervisor. Those roles grow as the church grows.

Although I value those roles and take my responsibilities seriously, I increasingly yearn to sit in silence. There are even times when I wonder if I have any word to offer, which is almost blasphemous for a United Church of Christ minister. Sitting in silence is for Quakers, not UCC pastors. But then I remember Deborah under her palm tree and my mother with her morning coffee. And I remember Joan Forsberg.

Joan, a UCC minister, was dean of students at Yale Divinity School during the ‘70s and ‘80s, a time when women were finding their voices and leadership in the church in new ways. As a mentor and role model for women students, Joan was a top candidate to speak at the first women’s reunion at YDS. As Women’s Center coordinator, it was my job to talk her into it.

We met over supper at a neighborhood café. After I affirmed the importance of her preaching, however, Joan told me that she couldn’t accept the invitation. "You can’t preach if you don’t have something to say," she said. "You have to have some word to offer. Right now, I don’t have one"

"I feel silenced," she explained. "Maybe it’s simple weariness. Maybe it’s feeling overwhelmed by all the demands. There have been too many changes -- in my life, this world, everywhere. The old answers don’t fit any longer, and I don’t have the words for new ones. It almost feels like the words have been taken away. I need to sit in the silence. I’m sorry."

We sat, I stirring my coffee, she dipping her tea bag. Part of me couldn’t believe what I had heard. How could this strong, competent role model feel silenced? Another part of me knew she was telling the truth, not just for herself but the rest of us. "Maybe you could talk about that," I ventured. "About not having the answers or even a good word, not acting or preaching or leading, but just sitting."

"Every woman of your generation would know what you were talking about," I added, "and most of the men too. And those of us still in school need to hear that word, too, because sooner or later, we’ll find ourselves sitting in that silence."

Joan did decide to preach at the reunion. She talked about being silenced by one’s life and having to sit without words or answers. She urged us not to fight the silence nor to castigate ourselves for it, but to let it teach us what it would. Except for sighs and sniffles, there wasn’t a sound in the chapel after she finished.

I don’t know how old Deborah was when she was a judge in Israel, but I’m now the age my mother was when I was a teenager and the age Joan was when we shared dinner that night. The longer I stay in ministry, the more grateful I am for the example of powerfully wise women who lead, counsel, advise, preach -- and sometimes just sit in silence.

Good Shepherds (Ezekiel 34:11-16, 2022)

As a child, I studied many different images of the Good Shepherd. I saw the official version every Sunday in the stained glass window above the altar at First Congregational Church in Tempe, Arizona. That shepherd was a tall, friendly-looking, 30-something man, fair of skin and eye with long, flowing, goldish-brown locks and soft hands. Dressed in a full-length white robe, he seemed remarkably clean for someone who supposedly spent his time chasing sheep. A little lamb nestled in his big, strong arms, while more sheep rested at his feet.

That image in the window, in its various versions, is probably the most familiar representation of the Good Shepherd, the one who, in the words of Ezekiel, will seek out the lost, bring them back from the darkness and lead them to good pastures. Yet as beautiful and peaceful as that image was, it didn’t jibe with my own experience.

I’d like to suggest some additional models for Good Shepherd pictures. Perhaps an artist could paint one of the men who wintered their sheep in the alfalfa fields a few blocks from the new subdivision to which my family moved in 1960. No long flowing robes for these sheep herders -- the material would have caught on the first cactus they encountered. Their jeans and flannel shirts were far more practical. These would be well worn, muddy and stained with sheep balm. (Like Ezekiel’s shepherd, these sheepmen spent a good deal of time binding up the injured and hurt.) Unlike the stained glass Good Shepherd, their skin was brown and weathered, their eyes bloodshot from the Arizona sun, and their hands callused and cracked.

Ezekiel’s shepherd is often on the move, but as any sheepherder will tell you, the times of search are the exception rather than the rule. Herding sheep involves long stretches of standing around watching the sheep eat. Often as not, I’d see one of the migrant sheepherders squatting under the one lone tree in the field, keeping an eye on the flock while taking a long drag on his cigarette.

A weather-beaten Good Shepherd with stained jeans and a Camel in his fingers will probably never make it into a church window. Yet it would represent a lot of God’s job with us human beings -- waiting around, watching what we’re doing, hoping we’ll stay out of trouble, and getting us out of it when we don’t.

Another childhood experience was envying 4-H friends who lived on the outskirts of town and could raise a lamb or two in their backyards. My 4-H projects were limited to cooking, sewing, collecting insects and working on home beautification. At demonstrations and contests, the little shepherds got to wear jeans and cowboy boots and hang out in the barns. I was stuck in my homemade uniform with its pleated skirt and button-down blouse, and resigned to defending the virtues of chocolate chip cookies and a well-kept house. But my envy turned to empathy when, at the end of the spring fair, the young shepherds’ woolly family pets were sold to the highest bidder. I saw more than one small shepherd sit on his hay bale, cowboy hat pulled down over his eyes as he buried a tear-stained face in his arms.

Idea for a window: a nine-year-old Good Shepherd weeping and holding on for dear life to his soon-to-be-lost lamb.

And one more. When I was seven, my mother gave me a book titled Little Herder in Autumn and Winter, The first of a series of children’s books written in both English and Navajo, it told the story of a little Navajo girl, her family and their sheep. The book’s cover showed the traditional Good Shepherd cradling a lamb with a serene, sure look. But the shepherd in the book was a seven-year-old, and the lamb was almost as big as she. Her face was round, her jet black hair was pulled back in a pony tail, and she wore a long, flowing skirt and a velvet blouse.

The story offered an image of a shepherd not unlike Ezekiel’s. "It takes many steps to keep up with the sheep," says Little Herder ("Na’nikkaadi Yazhi"). "The way is long, the sand is hot, the arroyos are deep. We walk until the day is done." In the winter when the snow covers everything, Little Herder and her parents take wood from their own dwindling pile in the hogan to build a fire to melt snow for their sheep. And one day, when a ewe is lost, the little girl searches until she finds both it and its new lamb. Even though it’s late, she’s hungry and the lamb is heavy, Little Herder carries it all the way home because it’s too young to walk quickly and a coyote is howling. Ezekiel’s Good Shepherd (or Isaiah’s or Matthew’s) has nothing on Little Herder.

Say "Good Shepherd" to most Christians, at least in this country, and chances are we see the stained glass window that I saw as a child. But Good Shepherds come in all sizes, shapes, ages and colors. As Ezekiel himself would argue, it’s the care for the sheep and the goodness of the shepherd that counts.

A weathered brown-skinned man with sheep balm on his jeans and a cigarette in his callused hand. A boy pulling his cowboy hat down over his eyes so you can’t see his tears. A little Navajo herder holding the lost lamb she’s keeping safe from the coyotes. All are images of Good Shepherds, and according to Ezekiel, all are images of God. Any stained glass makers around?

Oprah on a Mission: Dispensing a Gospel of Health and Happiness

The entertainment business is not usually thought of as a missionary enterprise, but talk-show host and media queen Oprah Winfrey is a woman on a mission. It says so right in her magazine’s table of contents: "This month’s mission The mission themes of the month in O, the Oprah magazine, are not exactly part of orthodox Christianity ("Fun," "Couples," "Freedom," "Strength"), but Oprah does refer to God a lot (as in her April column: "I used to ask God to help me master a new virtue every year").

At the center of Oprah’s mission, of course, is her daily TV talk show, which entered its 17th season this fall. Amid its hodgepodge of topics -- female war correspondents, the decorating challenged, moms who are mean to their kids, crime victims who forgive their assailants, and, oh yes, the quest to lose weight -- Oprah stresses a message: Make yourself happy.

Oprah’s work is about maximizing happiness for oneself and thereby for others. Make yourself happier, make your family happier, make your community happy, and better, by "using" your life. Far from being distinct, "happier" and "better" are pretty much synonymous in Oprah’s world. From a biblical standpoint, her teaching is idiosyncratic, like her name -- a misspelling of Orpah, Naomi’s other daughter-in-law in the Book of Ruth.

Oprah has a prominent pulpit from which to preach. Her TV show has an audience of 22 million viewers. Her two-year-old magazine has a readership of 2.5 million and is generally hefty with advertising. (The May issue, for example, hit an astounding 304 pages with around half of them occupied by advertising.)

Authors and publishers would also testify to her golden touch, Of the 46 works of fiction picked by Oprah for her book club (which she recently closed down), sales averaged 1.5 million in 1999, the club’s biggest year. In this arena, Oprah’s roles as saleswoman and spiritual guru blend. She prescribed edifying books, many of them by women or people of color. The stories were strong on plot, character and moral awareness.

Phyllis Tickle, who was editor of religion books for many years at Publishers Weekly and likes to describe religion books as "portable pastors," characterizes the Oprah books as "morally sound material, by and large, that is credible and enriching . . . Like most of what she does, you’re the better for having read them. Her tastes are very pastoral as well as literary."

"I have enormous respect for Oprah," Tickle continues. "Anybody who can better the living experience of thousands of people has to be respected. She may not be ordained but she sure is pastoral, and pastoral at a level that has a vast impact."

With her conversational ease and casual style, Oprah comes across the TV screen as personal and personable, both pastor and best friend, authoritative yet approachable. "She is like a personal institution," says Judith Martin, who teaches religious studies at the University of Dayton and has written on feminist spirituality.

It was somehow not surprising, then, that following the World Trade Center attacks, when New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani wanted someone to lead a multi-faith service to provide hope and solace to a devastated city and a stunned country, he turned to Oprah.

Oprah is, of course, preaching mostly to the nation’s mamas. Oprah’s magazine and TV show advertise products for women. Her TV audience is overwhelmingly female. Most of her book club readers are women, as author Jonathan Franzen understood when he worried that her endorsement might shoo male readers away from his National Book Award-winning novel The Corrections.

Oprah is preeminently the voice of women in the middle: middle-class, middle-American and, like Oprah, middle-aged. They are people caught in the middle of families, interpersonal conflicts, too many good intentions, and an overlong to-do list. These are women trying to manage busy lives and households, address personal and social concerns, and maybe also lose some weight.

Oprah offers lots of things to help. She is an encourager. "Live your best life" is the Oprah slogan, almost a verbal logo. Oprah offers tools for living your best life: books to read, people to emulate, material things to help (an eclectic assortment of goods that make up a monthly "O list" of belts, shoes, vases, towels and other accessories). The magazine contains "O to Go" paper goodies -- note cards, postcards and bookplates for readers to tear out. The feature "Something to think about" is another tear-out page for jotting down reflections on questions related to the issue’s mission. "How would you create an ‘inner-strength’ team?" "How can you be forceful without using violence or harsh words?"

The timing of the TV show, at least in the Chicago area -- Oprah’s home turf -- has a whiff of morning service. It’s an hour-long ritual each weekday at 9 AM., adding up to a lot more pulpit time per week than the average pastor enjoys, and in front of a lot bigger congregation. (Oprah herself used to attend a large Chicago church -- Trinity United Church of Christ, pastored by Jeremiah Wright. But according to Wright’s secretary, Janet Moore, Oprah hasn’t attended in 12 years.)

On one recent show, Oprah took viewers via videotape inside the homes of moms who say they are mean to their kids. These mothers had written to Oprah about their problem and asked for help. It’s painful to hear the children repeat, when interviewed, the insults their mothers have heaped on them. It’s painful to watch the mothers being grilled on TV by Oprah’s resident psychologist, Phillip C. McGraw, swearing they want to change but can’t. Dr. Phil and Oprah give no quarter, repeatedly insisting on nonabusive treatment for the children. The message is clear: change your behavior.

On Good Friday, Oprah’s topic was miracles. Her guest was Richard Thomas, the host of PAX-TV’s It’s a Miracle, which every week presents in re-created docudrama form "miracles": incredible and inspirational real-life stories of odds beaten, quirky coincidences, triumph mined from defeat, unaccountable survival. A videotape unrolls the story of a baby born very prematurely, with no apparent signs of life, who despite all clinical signs and assessment begins to breathe on her own. Two years later, the same girl now toddles onto Oprah’s stage holding her mother’s hand, offering a flourish of dramatic proof for doubters. The obstetrician is in the audience to say authoritatively that the girl’s coming to life is wholly inexplicable from a medical point of view. The miracles show closes with three generations of the gospel-singing Winans family belting out hymns, exactly like a church service. (The Winans offer their own miraculous testimony -- Ronald Winans survived a severe heart condition and is on stage to signal his return to the touring circuit.)

Another typical show features Gary Neuman, therapist and author of Helping Your Kids Cope with Divorce. A divorced couple sits on stage with their two sons between them. Videotapes unfold the story of the parents’ divorce from different family members’ viewpoints. The mother and father watch a videotape of their sons talking to Neuman about how they feel confused and caught in the middle between the parents. Right on the televised spot, this situation is going to be fixed. Mom and dad pledge out loud that they will get along better and not place their sons in the middle again. "Now that," says Oprah as the segment concludes, "is worth staying on the air for,"

Oprah’s show contains amazing tales and amazing candor. Confession is the show’s signature. Talk is crucial, even salvific, says Oprah. "The expression of your feelings is like magic," she says. But expression isn’t the ultimate aim of the show. The aim is to make things better.

Martin offers a feminist reading of Oprah’s mission. "I really think of Oprah as caring," she says. "If you compare her with somebody like Geraldo [Rivera], she has wealth and influence, but she uses it to empower others -- and that’s a big feminist thing."

When Oprah has a message she wants guests and the audience to grasp, she will ask fewer questions and give more advice. She tells divorced parents who are unable to get along to stop forcing their children to pick sides in parental disagreements. She often talks about "light bulb" moments or "aha!" moments (a recurring feature in the magazine also), moments of life-changing revelation. She’s explicit about wanting to provide help and resources: "What I want everybody to get . . . ," she says, referring to what she learned about managing her own health in a conversation with Dr. Christiane Northrup, author of the best-selling The Wisdom of Menopause. When she questions pop star Brandy about the young singer’s "spiritual journey," which included an abusive relationship in her teenage years, Oprah observes, "You’re gonna save a lot of girls today."

Oprah is a fixer. Which brings us to the role of Dr. Phil. The psychologist appears on the show every Tuesday to cut through people’s excuses. Dr. Phil works with moms who are having problems with their kids, people who need to make peace with their past errors, people having difficulties with their sex lives.

What’s your payoff? he will ask when guests on the show tell him they want to change some behaviors but just can’t succeed. People apparently love this bluntness. Dr. Phil’s own show premieres this fall.

Oprah has a whole team of fixers in addition to Dr. Phil: "life coach" Martha Beck, personal trainer Bob Greene and financial adviser Suze Orman appear regularly on the show and in the magazine. Whether it’s encouraging dieters or redecorating a living room, Oprah offers solutions to nagging problems that are blocking someone from living her best life.

"As a moderator of discussions and someone who can generate and respond to ideas, she does great work," says Scotty McLennan, dean of religious life at Stanford University and author of Finding Your Religion. "I think of Oprah as a very intelligent woman who is able to draw people out and engage people in a way that is educational and helpful."

Oprah wants to fix communities as well as individuals and their families. She is a consistent philanthropist, with her own as well as other people’s money Fortune, one of the very few media outlets to which Oprah has granted an interview, reported in April that Oprah has donated, mostly anonymously, at least 10 percent of her annual income to charity. Oprah’s Angel Network, promoted on her show and Web site, raised $3.5 million in 1997, its first year of operation. The Angel Network is supported by viewers. It has funded scholarships and Habitat for Humanity homes.

Oprah also sponsors Use Your Life Awards -- $100,000 awards to those engaged in social change. (Use Your Life funds are also underwritten by actor Paul Newman, already renowned for the philanthropy from Newman’s Own, his food line, and Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon.com.) These awards showcase compelling stories and send out inspirational messages. Recipients include the Red Feather Development Corporation, founded by former clothing manufacturer Robert Young. He became interested in housing for Native Americans, and has built affordable housing on reservations in the northwestern U.S. Former prostitute and drug addict Norma Hotaling’s organization SAGE (Standing Against Global Exploitation) works with prostitutes in San Francisco, many of whom have been abused and are addicted to drugs. Twenty-two individuals have received Use Your Life Awards for their organizations.

Oprah wants to do fixing her way She turned down President Bush’s request in late March to visit Afghanistan to help highlight some of the post-Taliban changes for women and children, refusing to let herself be used for someone else’s purpose. She has done shows before on the conditions of Afghan women, but she wants to teach on her own terms.

Some Oprah observers have called her shrewd; others have described her as a control freak. She would probably call it independence. In her April "What I Know for Sure" column in her magazine, Oprah writes: "The irony of relationships is that you’re not usually ready for one until you can say from the deepest part of yourself, ‘I will never again give up my power to another person."’ Personal conviction shades into professional application. The empowered woman is likely to be confident and decisive in business and in personal life.

"She brings a down-to-earth approach," observes Wade Clark Roof, frequent commentator on American religious trends and author of Spiritual Marketplace and A Generation of Seekers. "I think she talks out of experience and relates to people talking out of experience. Spirituality talk is talk that arises out of experience."

In other words, it is not just talk, but talk that’s been tested in life’s fires -- talk as testimony. As Oprah would say, this is about getting real. A preference for the freshness and immediacy of experience in reaction to the meaninglessness or venality of traditional faith is hardly new, of course. Spiritual renewal has ever been thus. Quaker founder George Fox wrote in 1647 of the inadequacy of the teachings of established religion: "But as I had forsaken all the priests, so I left the separate preachers also, and those called the most experienced; for I saw there was none among them all that could speak to my condition. Oh then, I heard a voice which said, ‘There is one, even Christ Jesus, that can speak to thy condition,’ and when I heard it my heart did leap. . . . And this I knew experimentally."

The show is founded on people testifying. For example, in developing a show on women who waited to have children, Oprah and her staff sought people whose experience tells the story. People obligingly write, e-mail and call. Oprah’s Web site receives 3,000 e-mails daily.

The show doesn’t stop when the TV hour ends. Discussion and questions continue after the cameras have stopped rolling, and "After the Show" is available at the Web site, prolonging the shared examination of the topic and providing resources to pursue the issue.

If Oprah’s spirituality is nontraditional, pick-and-choose what works from the world’s religions, its roots are in African-American Christianity. Jamie T. Phelps, O.P., who teaches at Loyola University of Chicago and the Institute for Black Catholic Studies at Xavier University of Louisiana, identifies significant elements of traditional black spirituality as well as postmodern eclectic elements, in the Oprah phenomenon. Authentic black spirituality, says Phelps, "understands we are all human beings. If you’re generally into black spirituality as holistic you have to love everybody -- that makes white people very comfortable."

Phelps suggests another reason for the comfort level of white viewers and fans with Oprah. The figure of the nurturing television personality echoes the historically and socially accepted figure of the nurturing black female. "She is the good black mama who takes care of white kids," Phelps says.

L. Gregory Jones, dean at Duke Divinity School, agrees that Oprah’s roots in the black church experience lend the television personality some of her authority. "It enhances her credibility on issues of spirituality, given the prominence of the black church," he says. "There is a cultural presumption of credibility that she can trade on."

Oprah’s attempt to transform community by promoting individual transformation is also a way of placing individuals within a larger community. There can be no separation, no isolated search to individual perfection. The individual’s betterment leads to community betterment. Individual spiritual life, and renewed life, is expressed in community and community renewal. The traditional black church has always addressed community ills, expressed community cohesion and been a refuge of liberty that is personal, social and spiritual.

"There is a personal relationship to God that has to flow over to concern for community," says Phelps. "It’s not a personal ‘getting holy’ but getting into right relationships with the community."

1. Oprah is easy to understand. She uses little words. You’ll never hear "postdenominationalism" or "hermenentics" or churchy jargon on the show. Her regular magazine column, called "What I Know for Sure" is simply written, and filled with her experience and reflections on that experience.

2. Oprah is very human. She admits to struggles with human temptations, like food. This distinguishes her from lots of other religious figures on television.

3. Oprah acknowledges the reality of suffering and also wants to do something to relieve it. At her prompting, people regularly tell wrenching stories of being abused or vicitimized. The woman known as the Central Park jogger, attacked 13 years ago in New York by a group of teenage boys, broke her public silence for an interview with Oprah in the April issue of O. Oprah’s 9-11 six- month anniversary show featured World Trade Center survivor Lauren Manning, a victim of serious burns. Suffering happens. Talking about it and exploring survivors resilience seems to help.

4. Oprah provides community of a sort. You can log on to www.oprah.com and pick from dozens and dozens of chat and support groups and message boards, (It’s true that virtual community and actual community are not the same things and have different benefits, but that’s another topic.) You can go to a bookstore and look for a book with an Oprah Book Club logo. Lots of others are reading that very same book.

5. Oprah encourages self-examination. The traditionalists might call it examination of conscience. A daily examen is a technique encouraged in Christian contemplation. Oprah would call it journaling or "something to think about," her magazine’s feature that presents questions for reflection.

6. Oprah teaches gratitude. St. Paul says:" Do not worry about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to Cod" (Phil. 4:6). Write those requests in your gratitude journal. "The gratitude journal is a wonderful idea as a supplement to people’s already formed spiritual life," says Jones at Duke Divinity.

7. Oprah is a reminder service: a reminder of what is good, what is important, what one person can do. In this info-glutted culture, the busy need reminders. Remember what’s important. My husband, a pediatric nurse in a suburban Chicago hospital, gets an occasional small dose of Oprah. In patients’ rooms during morning hours, the Oprah show will sometimes be playing, watched by moms sitting with their sick children. He recently asked one Oprah watcher what she liked. She watched, she told him, for the information: safety for children, decorating, etc. This information was not necessarily new, she explained, but she liked to be reminded.

8. Oprah teaches morality by highlighting and aging role models. Oprah profiles those who make a positive difference, She and her viewers also bankroll some of them, though her Angel Network.

9. Oprah listens. Being heard is good for well-being. Catholics put this to work institutionally in what is popularly called confession and formally known as the sacrament of reconciliation. This same principle is at work in the 12-step program, which requires confession of character defects as a foundation for responsible change. Confess, repent and be healed. In Dr. Phil’s words, own it.

10. Oprah promotes forgiveness, and tries to demonstrate that it is possible and how it is possible. She regards it as a tool for survival. She has regularly spoken with survivors of crime -- people who lost loved ones or were themselves victimized -- and returned years later to check on their progress.

A recent show featured Sharmeta Lovely a victim of rape, whom Oprah had interviewed ten years earlier, Oprah expressed amazement at Lovely’s stated willingness to sit down to dinner with her assailant. Yet Oprah often repeats a variant of this observation: "Forgiveness is something you do for yourself." In closing her conversation with Lovely, Oprah urged, "Preach, girl, preach to me."

Religion Sells

By a number of measures, sales of religion books are booming. The Association of American Publishers reports that religious publishing grew by 37 percent in 2003. The Book Industry Study Group predicts that religious book publishing will expand by 6 percent this year; it calls this sector of publishing "a growth business." The trade magazine Publishers Weekly reports that 18 percent of book buyers said in a survey that they had purchased a religious or spiritual book within the past 12 months.

These industry sources aren’t working off the same data, the definitions of what makes a book a "religion" title aren’t uniform, and religion publishing still makes up only 5 percent of the general market. Still, something’s happening in this corner of the book world -- something that reflects religion’s prominence in public life.

"Religion is very much in the public square." says Lynn Garrett, religion editor at Publishers Weekly. "We see that today in television and movies as well as publishing. Post 9/11, a lot of today’s issues wrap themselves around religion."

The prominence of religious or spiritual themes constitutes a rebuttal of sorts of the secularization hypothesis -- the notion that religion would fade as reason advanced and benighted souls saw the error of their superstitious ways.

"It’s not that no one still thinks that, but it’s lost a lot of its credibility," says John Wilson, founding editor of the journal Books and Culture. He calls it "the return of the repressed" after a time of institutional secularism that pushed religion out of public discourse. He sees religion pervading both popular and serious culture, and finds signs in unlikely places. University press catalogs tout volumes of poetry that depend on religious language even if the authors have no religion or religious intent. Dan Brown’s multimillion-selling thriller The DaVinci Code offers a highly unorthodox view of major Christian beliefs and institutions, and DaVinci fans and debunkers alike would agree that Brown is no theologian. But religion is central to the book.

"You’re talking about people using the language of Christianity whether or not they accept it," Wilson says. "The extent to which it’s penetrated peoples imaginations shows it’s Something happening oil a very large scale."

Within religion publishing, the most explosive growth is among distinctly evangelical sectors. Zondervan and Tyndale House can cite impressive growth in the past five years. Garrett says that PW’s survey turned up a lot of book buyers who identified themselves as evangelicals -- 40 percent of the group the magazine surveyed, a figure that squares with researcher George Barna’s estimate of what he calls the "born-again" population.

Evangelicals make up a sizable part of the population, evangelicals buy books, and evangelical publishers have been able to get their books into receptive hands. Their titles have penetrated the general market, and can be found in bookstores, price clubs, big-box retailers and discount stores. "Christian publishers are doing a pretty good job of marketing and selling," Garrett says. They have also gotten better at making sure that data from the evangelical Christian market are included in sales data from the general market.

At the supply end, evangelical publishers are cultivating authors who develop a loyal following -- readers eager to buy the next volume. All publishers do this, of course -- John Grisham and Stephen King always sell. Evangelical authors can reach their readers via a network of congregations, seminars and conferences within the Christian subculture. These provide convenient platforms to promote authors and sell books.

Martin Marty suggests that evangelicals fill a "vacuum" left by mainliners and Catholics and the "spiritual but not religious crowd," all of whom blend into secular culture and don’t offer a distinctive portfolio of beliefs. While evangelicals may be theoretically hostile to contemporary culture, many are at home in popular culture. The most successful have mastered the mass media, even while mainliners keep a distance. "There are a lot of paradoxes along the way," Marty observes.

The smell of success invites a crowd, especially when the overall publishing market is flat. Wilson points out that some major publishing houses have invested in evangelical lines; Random House with WaterBrook, AOLTimeWarner with Warner Faith, HarperCollins with Zondervan. "A lot of people in publishing didn’t realize this potential because it wasn’t their world," he says.

Some mainline publishers and other publishing specialists say a rising tide floats all boats. Presbyterian publisher Westminster John Knox and Lutheran publisher Augsburg Fortress report modest growth in sales. Many like to say they offer resources once people become interested in religious topics, whether it’s Jesus, the Bible or the Knights Templar. "We clearly are riding the coattails, to some extent," says Scott Tunseth, publisher at Augsburg Fortress.

The impact of Rick Warren’s The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth am I Here For?, published by Zondervan and nearing 19 million in sales, is inescapable. One new Augsburg title, Leading on Purpose: Intentionality and Teaming in Congregational Life, by Eric Burtness, consciously adapts for Lutheran leaders some of the "purpose-driven" principles Warren has developed.

Though Warren is a Southern Baptist, his book, written in what he has called deliberately "unchurchy" language, appeals to a broad audience, a spectrum of congregational study groups as well as individuals who may or may not belong to a faith group but who are examining their own lives.

"It’s a very straightforward title," says Mark Tauber, associate publisher of HarperSan Francisco, which publishes across the faith spectrum. "All blends and all stripes of people are saying, ‘What are we here for?"’

Tauber is struck by how Warren’s book has become a resource for communities, helping to define a group that is exploring something together. Other authors provide material for tying communities together. HarperSanFrancisco author Marcus Borg, with his progressive. mainline Protestant credentials, gets hundreds of invitations to speak to groups. Books are a tool for the faith journey not only for freelance spiritual explorers, but also for contemporary congregations, where they provide a call to community experience. "Partly what people want is to be with other people in community," Tauber says. "Religion has always been about community."

Religious themes in other media are also fueling book sales. Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ sold not only movie tickets but books. J. R. H. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings trilogy spawned a hugely successful series of movies that in turn has spawned books examining Tolkien’s theology. The "gospel according to" series published by Westminster John Knox on pop culture topics (begun in 1965 with The Gospel According to Peanuts, by Robert L. Short, and reinvigorated in 2001 with the successful The Gospel According to the Simpsons, by journalist Mark Pinsky) has mined popular media for theological meaning.

Phyllis Tickle, for many years an editor at Publishers’ Weekly and whom people in religion publishing credit with first reporting in the 1990s the wave of religious publishing, says discussion about God has undergone a seismic shift in location -- from didactic nonfiction to entertainment, whether that’s in fiction, television, movies or radio.

"As long as popular culture is religion for many readers, this will be a thriving area of publishing," says Henry Carrigan, North American publisher for T&T Clark International, an academic arm of Continuum, which publishes material aimed at Episcopalian interests.

One thriving genre in religion publishing is fiction, both serious and escapist varieties -- some of it explicitly about religion, some of it a more subtle engagement with questions and values. Dan Brown’s fictional The DaVinci Code would have sold fewer copies had it been about submarines, and probably would have spawned fewer than the dozen-plus books elucidating or refuting it.

Lillian Miao, CEO and publisher of Paraclete Press, credits evangelical fiction with building interest in the whole genre and making it possible for her small independent firm to publish such titles as Unveiling, by Suzanne Wolfe, a novel about an art restorer who experiences spiritual restoration in her own life.

"I personally find it fascinating that we can talk about these religious things in such interesting and beautiful ways," Miao says.

Though the National Endowment for the Arts has noted a decline in Americans’ reading of fiction, some religion publishers are opening fiction lines or adding to them. The Catholic house Loyola Press, for example, early next year will launch Loyola Classics, reprint editions of titles of Catholic interest from the mid-20th century, among them In This House of Brede, by Rumer Godden, and Do Black Patent Leather Shoes Really Reflect Up?, by John R. Powers. Fiction’s ability to use story and mobilize imagination to faith is hardly new; it was a popular vehicle in the 1950s, Tickle notes. "It’s due to have its say again," she says.

Tickle and others detect a post-modern pendulum swing toward conservatism or traditionalism, or what postmoderns believe a safe and desirable past might have looked like. Tickle links the interest in The DaVinci Code to the interest in The Lord of the Rings and television’s Joan of Arcadia. She characterizes it as pseudo-medievalism, a post-Enlightenment reaction that is reaching far back in Western history "to try to find the mystery again."

Religion publishers say they are also selling books that help readers discover or recover religious traditions, and which give structure to an otherwise amorphous spirituality. At Eerdmans Publishing, editor-in-chief Jon Pott says the firm now sells less in specialized Christian avenues and more in general outlets. This publishing house with Dutch Calvinist roots reaches a wide range of Christian readers, and even Catholic authors approach it with manuscripts. Dwelling in the Light: Icons in Christian Observance, by Anglican primate Rowan Williams, exemplifies a mainline reexamination of tradition. "Rowan Williams is a great conservator of the tradition and a first-rate theologian," Pott says.

Academic presses are less likely to be affected by swings of the commercial market. At Yale University Press, which does not publish religious studies as such, religious biography and religious history are strong areas, says senior editor John Kulka. He cites the success of the press’s biography of a 17th-century New England theologian, Jonathan Edwards: A Life, by George Marsden, as a sign of the wider culture’s interest in reexamining tradition.

Mainline publishers have plenty of opportunities in the current religion scene, as well as some fundamental assurance; religious belief isn’t going away. It requires detectives to spot expressions of it in Culture, and historians, theologians, spiritual guides and creative artists who can provide substance and sustenance to those ready for spiritual formation. Clear, authoritative and distinctive primers also find an audience. Publishers are urging their best minds to speak to larger audiences, to write accessibly on fundamentals of Christian faith, producing such series as Westminster John Knox’s New Testament for Everyone by Anglican theologian Tom Wright and Augsburg Fortress’s Lutheran Voices on basic Lutheran teachings.

Henry Carrigan at T&T Clark invokes the mid-20th century insight of theologian Paul Tillich that "religion is the substance of culture and culture the form of religion." Adds Carrigan: "The vigor in religion publishing is simply helping to make more and more explicit how deeply grounded in religion our cultural forms really are."

When Hard Work Doesn’t Pay

Are the poor blessed or lazy? The prevailing answer in America is lazy. The welfare revolution of the past decade put the poor to work. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 changed the social support system. As the name of the law implies, people are held personally responsible for getting out of poverty by taking advantage of work opportunities.

This work-based welfare system is now undergoing another round of scrutiny because the legislation needs renewal (see paragraph at end of article). President Bush is asking the poor to work more, invoking once again the goal of moving people from "welfare dependency to self-sufficiency."

Work is a gospel that we live by, seemingly more than ever. Sociologists tell us that the number of hours worked by American families have increased and that Americans work more hours than workers in other nations. The work ethic is a deeply held social value with biblical roots. It’s the gasoline of the American dream of getting ahead, the sweat-equity portion of home ownership. The poor themselves accept the gospel of work. In an essay in Welfare in America: Christian Perspectives on a Policy in Crisis (1996), political scientist Lawrence Mead writes:

In dependency politics, values per se are not at issue, only the realization of values. No one disputes that the work ethic and obedience to the law are good things. There is no evidence that the poor themselves question these values.

Yet the value of work ought to invite questions if the work itself proves not to be much valued. Those leaving welfare for work are earning between $6 and $8 an hour at the bottom of the economic ladder. For them, and other low-income working Americans, work and poverty coexist. Work does not lead to self-sufficiency.

Statistics on work and poverty paint the picture by numbers. In 2001, 38 percent of poor working-age adults held jobs. The Census Bureau, in its 2000 annual report on poverty, observes that "having a job, even a full-time job, does not guarantee an escape from poverty." It is more likely today than it was seven years ago, as the Census Bureau tracks trends, that poor households have a working family member.

Some of these households include children. A Department of Labor report from 2000 showed that 8.5 percent of families with children under 18 were "working poor." An Urban Institute study from that year estimated that one in six nonelderly (under age 65) Americans lives in a family in which adults work at least half-time but family income falls below twice the federal poverty level. This range is important because within it families are more likely to experience hardship: to skip a meal or a bill payment.

Despite changes in the economy since the Urban Institute’s data were collected, Gregory Acs, one of the authors of the report, says his one-in-six estimate remains reasonable.

In Low Wage Workers in the New Economy (Urban Institute, 2001), Richard Kazis notes that the incomes of more than 9 million working Americans are below the poverty level. He and others who analyze the jobs picture agree that low-wage jobs are a needed entry way into the economy. But for those with families to support and lots of bills to pay, "the challenge becomes what kind of policies can help people move up," says Kazis, senior vice president of Jobs for the Future, a Boston group that specializes in workforce development issues.

In a 2002 study of 30,000 welfare recipients, the Manpower Research Demonstration Corporation found that those who succeeded in staying off welfare were older, better educated, and had more recent work experience and fewer children and child care problems. (The average welfare family size is 2.6; some families have two children and a single mother, others only one child.) But success is relative to the goal of staying off welfare, not of escaping poverty. According to the report, "Many families who leave and stay off welfare long term are still poor when they leave."

For poor working families, the low wages of work aren’t a vehicle out of poverty but merely a bus ticket to the next paycheck. Barbara Ehrenreich rode that bus for a year, an experience she describes in Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America (2001). She chronicled her attempt to support herself on a variety of low-wage jobs, and reported on the economic difficulties of those with whom she worked. The insufficiency of work to provide self-sufficiency is behind the movement -- backed by many religious groups -- to ensure that all employers pay a living wage, which is generally understood to be the wage needed to support a family at or slightly above the poverty level.

The minimum wage is considerably less than a living wage. A full-time, 35-hour-a-week job paying $5.15 an hour (the minimum) yields a yearly income of $9,373. The federal poverty level for a family of three (with one wage-earning adult but three bodies to feed, clothe and house) is $14,259. If the pay scale rises to $8 an hour, the income rises to $14,560, one week’s paycheck above poverty level.

Consider the case of Myrna, a 42-year-old single mother supporting two children. The family lives in Aurora, a mixed working- and middle-class city of 150,000 outside Chicago. Myrna worked hard enough as a bank teller to get a promotion to teller supervisor. She got a $3,000 raise, boosting her income to $25,000. She also became eligible for overtime pay. Before her promotion, she had qualified for a state-paid child care subsidy. She paid $27 weekly for after-school care for her two boys, ages eight and nine. But she discovered that her promotion disqualified her for the subsidy. Unsubsidized, the cost rose to $108 weekly per child. So her advancement at work cost her $8,450 a year in child care assistance.

To buy a condominium, Myrna borrowed against her future, taking $3,000 from her pension plan. The mortgage payment and association fee claim $864 monthly; another $338 goes for payments on a used car she bought to replace one that kept breaking down. Her day care bill of $45 weekly now covers only her eight-year-old. The nine-year-old comes home alone after school and calls her. She regularly uses "overdraft protection" offered by her bank; if she writes a check and doesn’t have enough money to cover it, the bank loans her up to $500, which she repays with interest. "I’m living on credit, not a paycheck," she says. "There’s a lot of us out there living this way.

She explored other avenues. Her own employer wouldn’t refinance her mortgage when she applied; her debt-to-earnings ratio was too high, she was told. She went to court and was awarded child support from the children’s father, an undocumented alien who works in the same town. He gets paid in cash. She’s collected nothing from him.

"I never missed a court date and for two years they would say "continuation." The judge awarded me $100 per week, $20 arrearage, and I haven’t seen one penny, Myrna said. ‘They tell me they can’t garnish his wages because he doesn’t have a Social Security number."

Myrna plays by the rules. She reported, as required, the change in her income that disqualified her for child care assistance. "I would never abuse the system," she explains. ‘You know how some people lie just to get the money. I pay taxes too."

The renewal of funding for welfare, with its goal of turning the dependent nonworking poor into self-sufficient workers, could offer a chance to recalculate what it takes to make a worker self-sufficient. In an essay for the Institute for Research on Poverty, Thomas Corbett of the University of Wisconsin argues that the welfare system should consciously evolve from a system of income transfers to a tailored system of assistance for those experiencing economic hardship. That change could take into account a broader understanding of who qualifies for assistance, what assistance is, what is the purpose of assistance and how success is to be measured.

"Reauthorization" he writes optimistically, "offers an opportunity to rethink the nature of social assistance." Interpreted with vision, the welfare laboratory might produce the rough draft of a new social contract for former welfare recipients and other low-wage workers.

Such social assistance needs a lot of tailoring. On the economic margins, one shove can send someone over. When I interviewed residents of Hesed House, a homeless shelter in Aurora, in 2002 (the state wanted information about what homeless people need), I heard stories of disability, job loss or workplace closure, and eviction. One event is enough to knock over the financial house of cards that the underskilled or undereducated or underprepared inhabit.

Sometimes even skills aren’t enough when the cart of expectations overturns. Vicky, 38, was never homeless, but her customary middle-class lifestyle and expectations vanished when she and her husband divorced. With two school-age children, a business degree, work experience and financial support from her ex-husband, she still plummeted into financial straits, losing three jobs in less than a year’s time. Eventually she qualified to receive job training from a public agency that assists the poor. She also experienced hardship: not having enough money for food and other necessities. "I remember when they gave me toilet paper," she says.

Vicky received psychological aid and comfort from her small Methodist church. Members offered encouragement and helped her cope with her feelings of frustration and struggle. They also plugged her into community volunteering, keeping her busy as a tutor for kids at a low-income housing project. The job training she received eventually bolstered her confidence enough to help her land an administrative job in home health care management, which she’s held for two years. To enhance her income, she recently became a part-time entrepreneur, selling Mary Kay cosmetics.

Vicky’s economic ups and downs were stabilized, but she had advantages to begin with: an education, work experience, financial help from her ex-husband, a house. Those assets make a difference, and when one or more is missing, a low-income worker is more vulnerable to the next job loss or cash-flow crisis. The National Low Income Housing Coalition, an advocacy group, calculates that a worker would need to earn $14.66 an hour to be able to afford to rent a two-bedroom home. That’s just for the shelter. Add transportation, child care, and money to keep the lights or heat on,

Getting a second job is one strategy. "We get them hired at $7.50 or $8 an hour and they just can’t make it and end up taking a second job," says Mary Nelson, president of Bethel New Life, a Chicago-based community development organization that seeks jobs for former welfare recipients. "It’s just very, very difficult to survive, and these are people working hard and trying their best."

Bethel New Life also runs subsidized housing, recognizing that affordable housing is one piece of the whole picture that needs to be secured for a working family. Nelson ticks off the other necessities: transportation, health insurance, child care. "The conversation now needs to change from helping people get a job to helping people move out of poverty" she says. "It’s going to take a myriad of things."

The most successful approaches to helping the very poor do take into account and coordinate the many variables that affect workers and their family situations: employment availability job skills, housing costs, transportation, child care. Beyond government and social services, successful partnerships include employers, who control access to earned income. Income supplements for things like child care, which stretch an earned dollar, also need to remain for low-income working parents.

Alan Weil of the Urban Institute, which has studied welfare reform extensively, notes that the system has been slow to acknowledge the evolution of responsibility from helping the nonworking to supporting those who have advanced in the work world, as Myrna’s case illustrates. The Earned Income Tax Credit is another effective benefit for low-income families that enjoys broad support. "It’s a Republican philosophy that could help make a difference, and it needs to be expanded," says Nelson.

But disagreement over how much work to expect and how much help to give is fundamental. Welfare law is also social code that expresses values and adjusts behavior, Corbett says:

Cash welfare for families, although accounting for a tiny proportion of federal outlays, touches upon our most sensitive public issues: work, family, sex, abortion, personal responsibility and community integrity. Welfare has served as a proxy for fundamental questions about the quality of life in society and about how to allocate personal and public responsibilities.

Hence the welfare system is a social-engineering laboratory, encouraging marriages and two-parent families. It has expressed a preference between two alternatives. Household income can be increased if a family has two adult workers. It can also be increased if one hard-working employed person, whether a single head-of-household mother or a married head-of-household father, can advance in the workplace.

In the meantime, the economy that cooperated with welfare reform by providing jobs and economic confidence in the late 1990s has turned sour. The vigorous labor market into which the nonworking poor were sent is now characterized by 6 percent unemployment. The poor looking for work are having trouble finding it. The Association of Gospel Rescue Missions, representing 302 faith-based missions providing emergency services to disadvantaged groups, surveyed 20,000 homeless people and reported in November 2002 that more than 60 percent of those surveyed said they had more trouble finding work than they had six months prior.

Food pantries are reporting more visitors. One of Congress’s first acts this year was to extend unemployment benefits for those whose job loss last year pushed up the unemployment rate. The decline in welfare caseloads, widely cited as a sign of successful reform, has reversed course, heading back up: in the third quarter of 2002, 39 states reported an increase, making for an increase for the nation as a whole. In 2001, when the economic recession officially began, the poverty rate rose for the first time in five years, to 11.7 percent of the population, or almost 33 million people.

Perhaps the harder times ushered in by the recession can dent prevailing social attitudes toward poverty. In January, a poll commissioned by the Catholic Campaign for Human Development, the antipoverty effort sponsored by U.S. Catholic bishops, showed that 29 percent of those surveyed believe that lack of education is a principal cause of poverty. "Personal laziness" was cited by fewer respondents -- 26 percent. Fifteen percent cited a lack of good-paying jobs.

The same group was also asked who is responsible for helping the poor. The top answer, given by 43 percent, was government. Of interest to those who advocate faithbased social programs was the fact that, only 5 percent cited churches.

People like Myrna rely on God as well as their paychecks. "I’m very blessed," she says. The blessings she counts include employer-provided health insurance for her children, which makes her better off than 41 million Americans who don’t have health insurance.

-----------

Responding to Poverty: A Faith-Based Tool

Welfare reform has triggered experimentation by states, which are responsible for its administration, and copious research about what works. In this search for effective answers, the prevailing way of thinking about welfare and poverty has also cast a spotlight on religious congregations and the potential support they provide. Amy Sherman of the Hudson Institute, who has researched faith-based social service programs extensively, says that welfare reform has been a success insofar as it has changed how society thinks about helping the poor. She agrees that welfare reform is related to the larger issue of poverty reduction and that the social conversation about poverty needs to continue and broaden.

"I think that welfare reform should always be talked about in the larger context of winning the war against poverty," says Sherman, a proponent of faith-based solutions. "We want to get beyond what we started. We want to keep tracking and we don’t want to leave the working poor behind."

Arthur E. Farnsley II, a senior research associate for the Polis Center at Indiana University -- Purdue University Indianapolis who has also studied congregations and social services, is cautious about how much can be expected of congregations. Religious congregations do change lives, but they are effective precisely because they are religious. "Congregations can change people’s values, but they do so in a religious way," he says. "They don’t change values in general Monday through Friday, and then do something different on Sunday."

Looking to churches to resolve poverty may be unrealistic. "There seems to be an assumption that there is a secret source of energy in congregations,’ says Farnsley, author of the recently published book Rising Expectations: Urban Congregations, Welfare Reform and Civic Life. "It’s just not true."

-----------

Reform, Round Two: Work Harder

Funding for the 1996 law that changed welfare had an expiration date of September 30, 2002. So last year, Congress had an opportunity to renew and revise the system. The House and Senate disagreed, however, about funding amounts and changes for the system. Because fighting poverty was lower on the legislative agenda than fighting terrorism, only a funding extension won approval from a lame-duck Congress.

The Republican-controlled Congress has had higher priorities -- tax cuts first among them. Early this year, the House reauthorized funding for welfare as Bush had originally proposed, raising to 40 hours weekly the amount of work or training required of recipients. The bill also includes $300 million for marriage promotion. By late May the Senate Finance Committee, which is responsible for welfare legislation, had not acted on the matter.

Moderates Unite? The Future of Southern Baptist Dissidents

Should moderate Baptists, now fragmented into various groups, consolidate their forces into a full-fledged national denomination and try to provide a compelling alternative to the conservative Southern Baptist Convention? That was the most intriguing question brought up when more than 3,000 moderates gathered in Fort Worth in June for the annual general assembly of the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship.

The moderates’ break with the national Southern Baptist Convention came more than ten years ago after they were trounced in a Baptist "holy war" in the 1980s by politically savvy conservatives determined to enforce their conviction that the Bible is historically, scientifically and theologically inerrant. Moderates were cast out of Baptist centers of learning, missionary boards, publishing houses and the high offices of the 16-million-member SBC. But they have not gone away. They are inside, outside and on the fringes of the 157-year-old Southern Baptist Convention, which moderates contend has been turned into a top-down governed creedal body -- one that Roger Williams, John Leland and other founders of the Baptist movement would not recognize.

Networks of Baptist moderates, like the Cooperative Fellowship, have sprung up with the stated goals of preserving Baptist principles of priesthood of the believer, autonomy of the local church, religious freedom and separation of church and state. The moderates have had some success, but it has been limited. Now the moderates, who belong to the Fellowship, the Alliance of Baptists, Mainstream Baptist Network, Texas Baptists Committed and moderate-led state conventions in Texas and Virginia, are contemplating the future and searching for ways to expand.

How their future should unfold was clearly a matter of debate among those who attended the Fellowship’s three-day assembly, which had the theme, "It’s Time for a New Challenge."

One bold proposal came from Cecil Sherman, a warhorse in the Baptist battles, a founder and the first coordinator of the Atlanta-based Fellowship. It’s time, Sherman said, for moderates to begin shaping a national denomination that is larger than, but also encompasses, the Fellowship. He proposes uniting moderate groups, which he called "an ill-formed cluster of clusters."

"We have been building a new denomination for ten years," he said, comparing the moderate struggle to the Exodus. "We are out of Egypt but not yet in the Promised Land."

Moderates now are in a kind of wilderness, Sherman contends, and need to take steps to utilize energies provided by powerful moderates who run state conventions in Texas and Virginia, plus other new moderate groups in Missouri, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and Illinois.

"The ones most likely to lead us out of the wilderness," said Sherman, are Charles Wade and John Upton, executive directors of the moderate state groups in Texas and Virginia, respectively; David Currie, director of Texas Baptists Committed and Mainstream Baptists; and Daniel Vestal, chief executive of the Fellowship, who took over from Sherman in 1996.

Leaders of the 2.5-million Baptist General Convention of Texas -- which is larger than many national denominations -- are among the most active players in the moderate movement. They have been slowly distancing themselves from the SBC, cuffing back on funds sent to the denomination’s six seminaries and other agencies. Some more militant Texans, including former Baylor University President Herbert Reynolds, are advocating forming a Convention of Americas, with the Texas convention at its center.

Those at the Fellowship assembly met Sherman’s call for a moderate denomination with some resistance, mostly on practical grounds, while others felt some organizational development is inevitable.

"It ain’t gonna happen," said Vestal. "You don’t just form a convention by announcing it. I don’t think churches are going to join a new convention."

Vestal says local churches don’t want another denomination. Baptist church members, he said, have the SBC "in their DNA" and aren’t about to sever all ties with the denomination, even if they disagree with its leaders. Also, he holds that America is in a "postdenominational" era and that the Fellowship’s looser network structure is more attractive to local churches.

Vestal drew a pyramid to illustrate what he called a "dinosaur" method of top-down leadership exemplified by many national denominations, including the SBC. In contrast, he drew a molecular model with the local church at the center and lines radiating out to many groups like the Fellowship, which are "partners" with the local church.

James Baucom, 36, of Lynchburg, Virginia, agrees with Vestal about the Baptist reluctance to leave the national denomination. "It’s hard to leave Mama," he said. "To say you are a Southern Baptist is a cultural statement, and to break those ties is for many churches and many leaders very difficult." Baucom also thinks local churches are now dictating their own programs, and denominations aren’t as important. His church, the 1,000-member Riverfront Baptist Church, partners with many groups, including the Fellowship, the moderate-led state conventions and the Willow Creek Association (created by Bill Hybels’s Willow Creek Community Church outside Chicago), to provide resources for evangelism and spiritual growth.

Hardy Clemons, a South Carolina pastor and moderate leader, opposed the idea of a new moderate denomination. "I think that’s going back to Egypt," he said. But he likes Sherman’s analogy about moderates being in the wilderness. "Baptists have always been in the wilderness, and we like it there. Being in the wilderness means we are free of the restrictions and narrowness of the new management of the Southern Baptist Convention."

Similar disclaimers came from moderates following other SBC actions -- its boycott of Disney, its publishing of prayer guides targeting Jews, Muslims and Hindus for conversion on their holy days, and its adoption of a faith statement saying that women should not be pastors and that wives should graciously submit to the servant leadership of their husbands.

The Fort Worth assembly was billed as "not a convention, but a gathering of free and faithful Baptists, both laity and clergy . . . a celebration of new and creative ventures with the Fellowship network."

One of the highlights was the commissioning of new missionaries, including some going to Afghanistan and other Muslim areas. Names and images of some were not shown because they minister in areas where they are not welcome. A $4 million anonymous contribution was announced for expanding the global missions program, which targets areas where people are seldom served by other missionaries.

"We minister to street children in Nairobi and in Kiev, Ukraine; the homeless in Miami, Florida; Iranian immigrants in Southern California and Arab-Americans in Dearborn, Michigan," Gary Baldridge said in an interview. "We also work with people of Romany [Gypsies] throughout western Europe." He and his wife, Barbara, former missionaries in the Southern Baptist Convention, co-direct the Fellowship’s global missions effort.

Moderates also cheered Millard Fuller, founder of Habitat for Humanity, a new partner of the Fellowship, and David Massengill, a lawyer who lives near Ground Zero in Manhattan, where he and other members of Metro Baptist Church aided people who fled from the collapsing towers of the World Trade Center.

After the terrorist attack, Massengill said, the church’s associate pastor, Marti Williams, who had just come to the church a week earlier, took charge of efforts to help victims of the tragedy "If you think women are too weak to lead a church, then you’ve been hanging around the wrong kind of women," said Massengill, drawing an ovation.

Moderates are strong supporters of women in ministry and reject the 2000 Baptist Faith and Message Statement, adopted by conservatives, which says the Bible prohibits women from being senior pastors and that wives should submit to the servant leadership of their husbands.

Vestal countered critics who believe the Fellowship has progressed too slowly. "What has happened in the last ten years has been remarkable," he said in an interview. "Twelve new [moderate] theological schools have been born. We didn’t start all the schools but we partner with them. We have 139 missionaries in the field; a moderate publishing house, Smyth and Helwys, has been formed; the CBF has a $19 million budget. We have started a retirement program in cooperation with the American Baptist Churches, U.S.A. We have a CBF Foundation with a $20 million endowment, and we have representatives in 18 states."

Why hasn’t the moderate movement grown more? Some blame the apathy of moderate pastors who want to steer clear of denominational controversy; some say the moderate groups have failed to clearly articulate their beliefs in ways that capture the imagination of Baptists.

Conservatives also have successfully smeared the moderates with the liberal label, scaring off many churches, said Keith Parks, who served as the Fellowship’s global missions director after he was forced out of the presidency of the Southern Baptists. "By innuendo and implication the fundamentalists have convinced many that all moderates are soft on homosexuality and abortion and don’t believe the Bible," he said.

Roger Moran, a Missouri Baptist layman and member of the Southern Baptist Executive Committee, has distributed information through the mail, over the Internet and also through Baptist Press, the conservative convention’s news service, implying that moderates in the Fellowship, and also some moderate leaders in the Baptist General Convention of Texas, are too lenient on gay lifestyles.

The Baptist General Convention of Texas ran advertisements in secular newspapers accusing Moran of fostering "guilt by association" and noting that the Texas convention has taken stands against gay lifestyles and has dissociated itself from an Austin church which named an openly gay man as deacon. Moran says he’s not accusing all moderate Baptists of being supportive of gay lifestyles. But he said he can name many who are.

The Fellowship does not issue official positions on homosexuality or other social issues. But in the wake of Moran’s accusations that the Fellowship condones gay lifestyles, it adopted an organizational policy declaring that the Christian sexual ethic is "faithfulness in marriage between a man and a woman and celibacy in singleness." Also, the policy prohibits giving money to organizations "that condone, advocate or affirm homosexual practice."

"Moderates in the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship made some major mistakes in its early stages by not being more aggressive," contends David Currie, director of Texas Baptists Committed, a highly political moderates support group which has helped keep the Baptist General Convention of Texas in the moderate camp. Robert Parham, director of the Nashville-based Baptist Center for Ethics, which arose out of the moderate-conservative conflicts, said moderates have allowed themselves to be defined by others. When conservatives criticize the Fellowship, he said, moderates should be ready to quickly respond with "This is who we are. This is what we believe."

Sherman said a moderate denomination, to be successful, must focus on bedrock Baptist issues and warned against what he called "elitist" moderate groups that focus on single issues, like women in ministry or gay rights.

"Baptists are conservative people," he said. "If we don’t present ourselves in ways that make us sound more like them, they’re not going to join us. Christianity is about Jesus. It’s looking at God through Jesus. That’s the big idea. All the rest I can talk to you about."

Other factors, including regional bias, have kept many people west of the Mississippi from joining the Fellowship, said Bob Stephenson, a geologist and leader of Mainstream Baptists of Oklahoma. "There’s still a frontier mentality in Texas, Oklahoma and other places west of the Mississippi," he said, "We have a tradition of solving our own problems."

Stephenson said the moderates can’t lose heart, though, because they are representing "pre-1979" Baptists. The fracturing of the SBC began in 1979 in Houston when conservatives won the first of a series of presidencies which would allow them ultimately to dominate the denomination. Prominent moderates were shut out of leadership positions.

Attempting to fight back, moderates adopted some of the same political tactics they had decried when used successfully by Paige Patterson, Houston Judge Paul Pressler and other conservative leaders. The conservative methods were described by Roy Honeycutt, former president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, as "unholy forces" threatening to destroy cherished Baptist traditions of soul liberty and priesthood of the believer.

Conservatives won key presidential elections year after year as both sides sought to bring their people to the annual conventions. A Dallas convention drew more than 45,000 in 1985. But conservatives dominated. After a final conservative presidential victory in 1989 in New Orleans, moderates gave up the battle and began taking steps toward forming their own moderate organizations, such as the Cooperative Fellowship.

Walter Shurden, chair of the department of Christianity at Mercer University says most Baptist congregations have sought to avoid the controversy but now are being forced to take sides. This is particularly the case in Texas, Virginia and Missouri, where there are rival moderate and conservative state conventions.

Shurden, in an article last year in the Fellowship newsletter, put the Baptist conflict into three periods the struggle for national control (1979-1990), the fight over state conventions (1990-2000) and bitter battles in local churches (2000-2010).

About 90 moderate Baptist congregations have seceded from the conservative national body, including the 2,000-member Wilshire Baptist Church in Dallas. "We got tired of explaining to people that we were not like those other Baptists," said its pastor George Mason, a member of the Fellowship’s governing board. One of Mason’s members, Dot Laux, 82, who is making a Cooperative Baptist Fellowship -- sponsored mission trip to Macedonia this summer, said the decision to leave the denomination of her youth was painful, but she favored it. "We’ve been Southern Baptists all our life and we were concerned about the missionaries," she said. "Fred [her husband] and I still give to the Lottie Moon Christmas offering," a fund for the national denomination’s missionaries.

Jimmy Allen of Big Canoe, Georgia, the last moderate elected SBC president (in the late 1970s), tends to agree with Sherman that moderates have been in the process of forming a new denomination for some time.

"I think we are in the birth pangs of a new denomination, but the birth pangs have lasted much longer than we would have liked," said Allen, who presided over "A Consultation of Concerned Baptists" in Atlanta in 1990 that led to the forming of the Fellowship. Baptists should listen to both Vestal and Sherman, he said.

"I think Dan Vestal is right in that there is not a yearning to repeat some traditional denominational structure," said Allen. "But I think Cecil Sherman is right that it is time to move to the next chapter."

Allen believes "a new breed of denomination" which will allow broad freedoms will arise in the next eight to ten years, centered on the moderate state conventions and other groups. "I doubt if any existing structure can contain it," said Allen. "The Fellowship won’t be the containment of it. It will be a denomination larger than the Fellowship, but the CBF and its missionary programs will be a pivotal part of it."

Foy Valentine, who headed the old Southern Baptist Christian Life Commission before the conservative takeover and is something of an elder statesman among Southern Baptist moderates, said his fellow moderates have to be patient as they seek the best way to promote their Baptist vision. "It will take decades for this split to get gestated, but it is gradually taking place," he said. "The Baptist movement is not going to perish. It is a part of the way Christians are prepared to do church, and that is going to take place."

Valentine said moderates are fragmented at the moment, but that will gradually change. "Now we just have to do things in the old society method, which is what a lot of Christians have always done," he said. "But ultimately down the line there will be some coagulation where we can do things better together."